The News did a follow-up story on the recently released DISD audit, and the story raises an interesting question: Is finding "incompetence" at DISD good news or bad? The story looks at both sides of that question. Those who think it’s good news believe that Supt. Michael Hinojosa now has the ammunition he needs, as well as the funding, to solve this problem for the most part in the next couple of years. Those who think the audit means bad news for DISD seem to believe that uncovering incompetence at DISD isn’t that difficult, has been done plenty of times in the past, and just shows that the goofs running the asylum now are no different from the many sets of goofs we’ve had during the past 20 years. As I said before here, DISD’s biggest problem has been too many leaders lasting only a year or two or three, giving the incompetent staff there a chance to keep hiding in plain sight while each new leader figures his/her way around the district, only to be gone before being able to take action and be responsible for who works there. If Hinosjosa sticks around another five or 10 years, we won’t be able to use that excuse anymore, but right now, it works.