Panera project on Garland is dead, owner ‘considering other options’

The parking lot on the left may soon be a restaurant with liquor sales, while the office building will soon be a Panera. (Photo from Google Maps)

The drive-thru proved to be the sticking point for the Garland Road Panera project, which has died on the vine.

“Councilman [Mark] Clayton is firm. He will not support Panera Bread or any other restaurant with a drive-thru window,” says Robert Reeves of  Robert Reeves & Associates, Inc. , the zoning consultant working with Oklahoma-based developer Onyx Holdings, LLC. “Panera Bread is not interested without a drive-thru window. My client considering other options.”

Clayton concurs that he was staunchly against the idea of a drive-thru at the site that currently houses medical office buildings (the owner bought two plots, 9323 and 9239 Garland, which flank Beachview). The newly reelected councilman says the idea was unpopular with neighbors and went against the best practices of the Garland Road Vision, a document created in 2010 to guide development in the neighborhood.

Sponsored Message

“I’ve always tried to use that to guide my decisions,” Clayton says of the Garland Road Vision.

He is confident there is a better option on the horizon. “We’re going to get something way better than a Panera,” he says.


WANT MORE?
Click to sign up for the Advocate's weekly news digest and be the first to know what’s happening in Lakewood/East Dallas.
Written By
More from Emily Charrier

Watch: 1925 house demolished on Oram

Whether you hate to see neighborhood homes demolished, or love to watch...
Read More
  • Sue

    I happened to live on Beachview and the residents around here DO NOT want another lane on Garland Rd or a drive thru here. Let’s out all this in YOUR backyard and take a vote

  • Pingback: Neighbors petition Clayton to allow Panera drive-thru - Lakewood/East Dallas()

  • Michael Williams

    500 cars will impact OUR – Casa Linda – area badly regardless where they originate. But all we have heard from Mark is negative about Panera, not a word about the apartments. And it might help the local liquor store known as Albertsons and the other businesses but will do very little for the rest of us who live here except make someone like me drive to Jupiter instead of Easton to avoid the Buckner plug

  • Michael Williams

    I meant exactly what I said, and how dare you! The only section 8 housing residents I have ever encountered were white, actually grey as they were strangers to soap and water and ran a junkyard out of the property. The city finally removed their operation and they left shortly thereafter

  • Los_Politico

    Why don’t you just be up front and say “no blacks” like you want to?

  • plsiii

    I live in Little Forest Hills and Mr. Clayton has been very responsive and I think listens to his constituency (which isn’t HP,UP, Lakewood) and in my opinion made the correct decision on a Drive-Thru Panera.

    I don’t know anything about big money from the neighborhoods you mention, except for that the new Chickfila is someone out of Lakewood… Panera people are out of OKC and the apartment people are headquartered in Miami FL.

    Personally it’s less about where someone’s from and more about what they want to do and how it will impact our neighborhood.

  • Michael Williams

    You’re braver than I am. I barely feel safe on Garland Road in a large heavy vehicle.

  • Michael Williams

    And will some of these “smart, pedestrian friendly” residents of these lovely apartments be like the ones on John West? The ones who jump in the street and twerk drivers

  • Michael Williams

    I did not say there was any actual conspiracy, just he knows where the big money is (Lakewood, HP, UP) and where it isn’t (Little Forest Hills) and what they want.
    They want the wretched apartments and the income they will bring – not to our side of the area and not something that would bring them the big bucks. And Mark is delivering.
    I see no difference between 500 cars at an apartment complex and 500 at a Panera. Perhaps you can enlighten me, because Mark has not seen fit to do so.

  • Pat Kirby

    This is the last chance to make this happen before the deal is officially dead. If you would like to see that a Panera Bread is built on Garland Rd. near Casa Linda, then please sign this petition.

    https://www.change.org/p/mark-clayton-bring-panera-bread-to-garland-road-we-need-your-help?recruiter=725681435&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

  • Pingback: News Around Our Neighborhood – June 1, 2017 | Lakewood Hills Neighborhood Association()

  • erica from dallas

    Michael,So you think just creating a conspiracy and dragging in a good man into it is ok? Mark won the election by walking over 3000 houses and sending out thank you notes. If you look at Mark’s treasurer’s report he has no large donors like many of the other council members. What you fail to see is the City Council district is large and diverse ranging from Northwest Highway and Abrams to Ferguson and to Gaston. I would encourage everyone in District 9 to attend a meeting at City Hall or watch a recorded meeting on Dallas City Hall Website. We are so fortunate to have one of the most respected people in Dallas representing us.

  • I LOVE MY GAS GUZZLING SUV

    HA!! Lest you forget that Gallup presidential polls are conducted on 1,000 people out 290 million (even though they sometimes miss…GO TRUMP btw!) There are actually only 21,665 people in ZIP 75218 according to the last census. So I’m doubling down that statistically 80% in favor out of 227 people polled is probably not bad off. Any statisticians in the room that can give professional opinion?? It’s been so long since my last Stats class in college!

    Dude, the highway isn’t going away (nor do I want it to go away). I much prefer to be in my car vs. a DART bus. I would love to see a pedestrian tunnel under Garland Rd. though, so I don’t get killed on my daily bike ride.

  • plsiii

    Just to be clear, the poll was 227 people total out of probably 100k that live in the area… and was somewhat vague on the drive-thru issue and zoning implications. Panera has a new business model, they want to build new stores with drive-thrus… fine. We need a new business model (and maybe this is the beginning of working on one) on the east side of White Rock Lake which should be to encourage smart pedestrian friendly development, that may one day lead to alternative modes of transportation and not a state highway separating us from such a fantastic amenity as the lake and parkland.

  • I LOVE MY GAS GUZZLING SUV

    Folks, Mark Clayton is being less than honest about this whole Panera thing. Maybe he is waiting for the owners to sell? Maybe he has a pet project/developer in mind? It’s a real headscratcher! The reasons he gives for not allowing the Panera Bread to go through make no sense at all…..a) He says he is looking beyond Panera regarding the drive-thru (doesn’t want a fast food restaurant to someday come in), HOWEVER, what he doesn’t truthfully tell anyone is the developers offered to write it in the plan that the drive-thru would only apply to Panera and nothing else. b) He says “the neighborhood doesn’t want it”. Correction, Mark Clayton doesn’t want it! More than 80% of people polled (200+ respondents), want it with or without the stupid drive-thru. Honestly, who really gives a crap except for a handful of local utopians that have crazy ideas about making Garland Rd. smaller and walkable. Go smoke another joint. It’s a needed artery for traffic. I need to get from Point A to Point B like everyone else in the quickest manner possible. As far as I’m concerned, let’s add another lane each way!! (who do we call at the State of Texas Highway Department??) c) He claims that “something way better is coming”. Sounds like a line of politician BS to me. d) He won’t engage the developers—they try to call and email him—no response. I’m sorry, isn’t this his job?? And finally, the biggest whopper of them all…. e) He says he uses the Garland Road Vision as his road map for development. Well that’s funny, because I have seen with my own eyes a copy of a letter dated July 26 addressed to Plan Commissioner Michael Jung from the two co-chairs of the Garland Road Vision (public access to the case file is available at City Hall–Zoning Case Z156-281). They both ENDORSE the Panera project for God’s sake!! Wassup with this Mark?? Just approve the dang thing so we can all move on!

  • plsiii

    When you think of “several hundred thousand possibly one million” as money you could save/not spend/profit, it’s something, but too much?!? Considering what they paid for the land and what it takes to get a Panera franchise I’m guessing it’s the path of least resistance… Or was…

    I think the way it works is developer buys land, developer clears land, developer finds highest paying leasee and cares not what is done with/on the land. We have to change that equation for the developer, for ourselves and not least of all our environment.

    When you think of that money as useful in giving an existing structure a second life and saving all the embodied energy in tearing it down (the physical act, but also where does all that debris go, how it gets there etc…) not to mention building whatever is to replace it… that’s not a lot of money.

    To be clear, it wasn’t a NO to Panera, it was a no to Panera with a Drive-Thru, if they are/were truly community focused and serving they would have listened to the neighbors. When you think of their other locations (not on interstates in DFW) they do not have drive-thrus (Lemmon Ave, Park Lane, Preston etc…) Also we’re fairly saturated with drive thru’s, I know “what’s one more,” but smart, pedestrian friendly development, is what we need to serve our neighborhoods and White Rock Lake and park…

    I don’t think the apartments are a done deal, but density is coming no matter… so we need to prepare, not by building drive thrus, but by improving infrastructure to accommodate different modes of transportation and utilize that transportation, as well as being smarter about pushing commuter traffic out to the interstates where it belongs.

  • Michael Williams

    I smell some old musty money behind this. Someone who “is” wants that property.

  • Michael Williams

    He said at one of the neighborhood meetings that to remediate the problem would cost several hundred thousand possibly one million.
    That’s too much in my book.
    But we’ll soon have some more square footage when the new apartments go up and bring in at least 500 extra cars. What’s the difference between that and a Panera? Mr. Clayton has been Silent Sam on that. Perhaps a matching project could be built where the old Albertson’s is on Mockingbird

  • plsiii

    Define “too much” ?!? …Asbestos can be abated and I’ll give you the existing building isn’t much to look at currently, but it could be. I’m guessing the asbestos is just an easy excuse to scrape the building. Not that the current owner needs an excuse at all, he owns it. It’s just a drag that they’re gonna tear down almost 40,000 square feet of usable space to construct almost 4,000.

  • Michael Williams

    Well we will have some lovely apartments and the traffic they will bring about 500 extra cars. But that’s only Garland Road, isn’t it?

  • Michael Williams

    But he has been very quiet about the apartments near the old Presbyterian church. I smell some old money talking

  • Michael Williams

    Too much asbestos

  • plsiii

    Who are the GRV co-chairs? I’ve emailed through the website but no one responded… We need to think bigger than just another drive thru for these properties that are coming available and presenting great opportunities to make a difference and impact community and respond to the great resource that is white rock lake and adjacent parkland. Let’s encourage getting out of our vehicles, walking/biking and taking in the surroundings not just barreling through at 40-60 mph.

  • East Dallaser

    I know for a fact that the GRV co-chairs endorsed the Panera. Furthermore, there was a poll conducted on Nextdoor where more than 80% of Clayton’s constituents was for the Panera. I’m also told that the owners are now talking with a Methadone clinic…bot saying its true but that wpuls surely hurt Clayton’s re-election bid.

  • plsiii

    Maybe the building at 9323 could be re-imagined (larger/more fenestration along with a facelift) as a mixed use development, retail on the lower level, co-working and makerspace above, roof top bar & grill with WRLake views on top!

  • Stejay Bee

    I support this. thanks mark.

  • Garrett T. Monroe

    This is disappointing. Panera is a wonderful company with a terrific record of giving back to the community, particularly those in the community who are not so fortunate as to say “No!” to a drive thru window.